As long as there are people looking for employment, in other
words as long as there is employment,
there will be advice on how to get it.
Here we have three pieces from two authors, one maybe the best
employment-obtaining columnist in the nation, and one with a standpoint of
value without much previous stature in the field, anthropology. What are they saying, and how much merit does
it have?
First is another incisive warning from Liz Ryan of Forbes, her August 8th “Ten Signs You’re
Interviewing For A Fake Job Opportunity.” She recapped a letter received from a blogger
cold-recruited for “Director of New Markets” and brought in for four
interviews, during which “every conversation was stimulating,” then invited to
a fifth, before which he overheard himself being described as a “tremendous
resource… helping us figure out how to market our new products.” He left the meeting early, then, when his
main interviewer asked him to meet with a customer, requested that the man “get
serious about this job offer,” after which he was never contacted again.
With online sources giving information about people’s
knowledge and experience, which is often more than seekers of lower and middle
management positions usually had in decades past, such abuse is a real problem. Her ten tipoffs included a lack of apparent
vetting and new interviewers every time who record your answers (“If they were
going to hire you, why would they need to write down what you say?”),
contrasted with vague and ever-changing information on their recruiting
process, inability to articulate business “pain” with which the organization
needs help, and a situation where “the job title, reporting relationship and
responsibilities change every time you talk to them.” As Ryan has written before, when all the
company seems to care about is obtaining what you know, it’s time to talk instead
about a consulting fee.
The second piece was Richard Eisenberg’s November 9th
Next Avenue “Why Job Hunters Don’t
Find Work,” an interview with anthropology professor Ilana Gershon. She reached five ostensibly
preconception-free conclusions, that personal brands don’t help people get
jobs, that “people you don’t know very well” aren’t worth much either, that
“employers rarely know” how effective potential hires would be, that true
workplace ties are the best, and that age discrimination is often implemented
by employers dropping applicants without communication. I think better of personal branding than
Gershon, as it is a way of becoming known before jobs become open, and don’t
think all people have enough direct work contacts to ignore the secondary ones,
but otherwise I can’t disagree with any of these.
The third article, published January 9th and also
from Liz Ryan in Forbes, gave me more
to quarrel with than anything I can remember from her. Perhaps that started with the overstated
title, “Ten Things Every Hiring Manager Is Looking For.” Clearly she was right about candidates’
needing to tell stories showing, instead of just stating, that they are
“hard-working, smart and reliable,” even if such tales may not be believed, but
those filling jobs don’t always particularly want “someone who can think on
their feet,” “who’s dependable and keeps their commitments,” or “who has a
sense of humor,” especially if they are not like that themselves, and it is
surprisingly naïve to say that “they want to hire someone who has great ideas
and is happy to share them,” or “is willing to learn, and to teach what they
know.” Having been told I wasn’t “a good
fit” for a position that fit me like an Italian driving glove, after a day’s
worth of interviews during which I emphasized my quality with actual work
experiences, may have biased me, but I think most long-time corporate managers
have seen the same.
So what does work for getting a good job? I will stay with my perceptions, originated
by me during a half-year of unemployment and seconded by my career counselor,
that hiring managers want two things:
someone with specific experience at the position in question, and
someone they like personally. You will
know when you have the former, and the latter is far too individual to say,
beyond ordinary manners and courtesy, what will win you over to “every”
interviewer, or even to most of them. As
with tournament bridge, all you can do is play your game, and if you lose, you
lose. As with standup comedy, since you
always risk it you should ensure that if you bomb it is with your own
material. As I learned in comedy improv,
if you “suck” and “die” you should smile and bow. Accordingly, prepare, be on time, and be
yourself. That is the right approach.
No comments:
Post a Comment