The seasonally adjusted number of unemployed Americans fell
100,000 to 6.6 million, with the actual count just more than that, at 6,671,000,
befitting the move from generally poor-employment February to averageish March. Adjusted joblessness stayed yet again at
4.1%, with the unadjusted rate falling from 4.4% to that same figure. The number of long-term unemployed, out for
27 weeks or longer and still officially jobless, fell 100,000 to 1.3 million,
and the tally of those working part-time for economic reasons, or seeking a
full-time opportunity unsuccessfully thus far, dropped 200,000 to reach 5.0
million. The two best measures of how
common it is for Americans to have jobs, the employment-population ratio and
the labor force participation rate, held and almost held last time’s 0.3% improvements,
ending at the same 60.4% and down 0.1% to 62.9% respectively. Average nonfarm payroll earnings were up 7
cents per hour, a tad more than inflation, to $26.82.
The American Job Shortage Number or AJSN, which tells in one
number how many more positions could be easily filled if it were common
knowledge that they were available, improved substantially but mostly seasonally
to 16.3 million, as follows:
Noteworthy AJSN component changes were unemployment, unadjusted
as are all the metric’s inputs, down over 400,000 for a 378,000 net effect, an
almost 200,000 fall in the count of those who did not look for 12 months or
longer which cut the AJSN by 156,000, and a 77,000 rise in those reporting as
discouraged adding a net total of 69,000.
The number claiming no interest in working gained almost 500,000, but,
at only 5% of them presumed to work if opportunities were truly plentiful, nudged
the AJSN up less than 24,000.
Compared with a year before, the statistic showed that we
are still improving beyond simple low unemployment. It is now 933,000 lower than March 2017, with
only 551,000 from reduced official joblessness but almost 400,000 from the
half-million improvement in those wanting work but not looking for it over the
past year. That is impressive.
So how, overall, did we do?
The net new jobs number, though the 90th consecutive nominal gain,
was disappointing, but the other figures were generally good. There easily could have been more fallback
after February’s stellar performance. As
a result, it wasn’t large, but I did see the turtle step forward once again.
No comments:
Post a Comment