So what guidelines can we follow in determining from a Work's New Age perspective, beyond these numbers, which are the best and worst for the future? Here are 20:
- Jobs that cannot reasonably be automated away are good.
- Jobs dependent on obsolescent or endangered technology are bad.
- Jobs that must be done locally are good.
- Jobs that do not include health insurance are good.
- Jobs producing less scalable goods and services MAY be good.
- Jobs that seem to be maximized in efficiency already are good.
- Jobs that cater to “the 1%” are good.
- Jobs that help people working very long hours are good.
- Jobs related to personal travel, especially custom-designed, exotic, or expensive, MAY be good.
- Jobs that require highly unusual sets of aptitude MAY be good.
- Jobs in skilled trades MAY be good.
- Jobs connected with highway, road, bridge, or airport repair, design, or construction MAY be good.
- Jobs with artificially high or restrictive entry requirements MAY be good.
- Jobs with a high percentage of women working them, in perception or reality, MAY be good.
- Jobs in which Americans are particularly valued MAY be good.
- Jobs connected with extraction are bad.
- Jobs connected with manufacturing are bad.
- Jobs involving showing people how to do quaternary things (nonpaying productive activities for their own sake) are good.
- Jobs connected with health care MAY be good.
- Jobs connected with products disproportionately likely to be used by people over 65 MAY be good.
No comments:
Post a Comment