This morning the headline jobs number came in much worse
than expected. Far from a projection of
180,000, there were only 98,000 net new nonfarm positions created in
March. But don’t let that fool you.
Almost everything else improved, starting with stunning
drops in the official unemployment rates.
The one you hear about the most, seasonally adjusted, did not stay at
4.7% as some expected but fell to 4.5%.
The unadjusted figure, higher since in March fewer people are working
than in an average month, plunged even more, from 4.9% to 4.6%.
The other results were consistently favorable. The count of long-term unemployed, or people
officially jobless and out for 27 weeks or longer, was off 100,000 to 1.7
million. The tally of those working
part-time for economic reasons, or unsuccessfully seeking full-time work while
maintaining shorter-hours employment, also dropped 100,000, reaching 5.6
million. Average private nonfarm wages
were up a nickel an hour to $26.14, nothing trivial when inflation is less. While the labor force participation rate
stayed at a strong-by-recent-standards 63.0%, the employment to population
ratio, helped by lower joblessness, ticked up 0.1% to 60.1%.
The American Job Shortage Number or AJSN, which shows latent
demand for work, or how many more American positions could be filled if getting
one were known to be easy and routine, dropped a surprising 647,000, with the
categories of marginal attachment adding 105,000 to the effect of reduced
official joblessness, as follows:
The net new jobs disappointment, and its failure to match
those needed for population increase, notwithstanding, March was clearly a
positive month. With room to spare in
February’s 235,000 gain, the data gives no signs of a correction, and already
excellent figures such as the unemployment rates are still improving. The share of latent demand coming from
official joblessness is now only 38%, meaning that there is too much unfulfilled
general interest in work for the economy to be as robust as that 4.5% would
indicate. Yet the turtle, once again, did
take a step forward.
No comments:
Post a Comment