This morning’s Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment Situation Summary looked fine at the top, with its 315,000 net new nonfarm positions vindicating the published 300,000 estimate, and covering several times our population-increase requirements – but what was in it otherwise?
Seasonally adjusted unemployment rose 0.2% to 3.7%, with
300,000 more or 6.0 million jobless. On
the unadjusted side, there were 350,000 fewer people working but an almost unchanged
number unemployed, 1.1 million more saying they did not want a job, and unemployment
at a third-straight 3.8%. The counts of
long-term jobless or out for 27 weeks or longer and those temporarily laid off
were unchanged or virtually so. The two
measures of how common it is for Americans to be either working or one step
away, the employment-population ratio and the labor force participation rate, both
improved, reaching 60.1%, up 0.1%, and 62.4%, up a surprising 0.3%,
respectively. Clear downsides were in
the number working part-time for economic reasons or holding such work while seeking
a full-time opportunity, up another 200,000, and average private nonfarm payroll
wages, dropping away from inflation with a weak 9-cent gain to $32.36.
The American Job Shortage Number or AJSN, the indicator
showing how many new positions could easily be filled if all knew they were
readily available, lost substantially, as follows:
This morning’s Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment
Situation Summary looked fine at the top, with its 315,000 net new nonfarm
positions vindicating the published 300,000 estimate, and covering several
times our population-increase requirements – but what was in it otherwise?
Seasonally adjusted unemployment rose 0.2% to 3.7%, with
300,000 more or 6.0 million jobless. On
the unadjusted side, there were 350,000 fewer people working but an almost unchanged
number unemployed, 1.1 million more saying they did not want a job, and unemployment
at a third-straight 3.8%. The counts of
long-term jobless or out for 27 weeks or longer and those temporarily laid off
were unchanged or virtually so. The two
measures of how common it is for Americans to be either working or one step
away, the employment-population ratio and the labor force participation rate, both
improved, reaching 60.1%, up 0.1%, and 62.4%, up a surprising 0.3%,
respectively. Clear downsides were in
the number working part-time for economic reasons or holding such work while seeking
a full-time opportunity, up another 200,000, and average private nonfarm payroll
wages, dropping away from inflation with a weak 9-cent gain to $32.36.
The American Job Shortage Number or AJSN, the indicator
showing how many new positions could easily be filled if all knew they were
readily available, lost substantially, as follows:
The improvement came from fewer people wanting work but not looking for it for a year or more, taking 229,000 away, and a 122,000 reduction from not as many discouraged. The other components above, as a group, almost precisely broke even. The share of the AJSN from those officially unemployed is still about one-third, with a 0.7% gain to 33.7%, and compared with a year before the AJSN is down over 2.1 million, almost all of that from lower unemployment.
On the pandemic side, there were mild changes between July 16th’s
and August 16th’s New York Times data.
The seven-day rolling average of new daily cases fell 23% to 100,854 –
the same for deaths rose 10% to 467, hospitalizations increased 3% to 41,830,
and vaccinations were up 18% to 275,267.
As our situation becomes a de facto endemic, we see no indication that people
are overly endangering themselves by working.
So what happened this morning? It was a strange report, with contradictory
numbers, and a settling one, with, quite possibly, narrow ranges becoming
established. A goodly number of people
seem to have left their jobs, either moving to the fringes of work or claiming no
interest. There are ever more positions
out there, but, between slower wage gains, plenty of people not upgrading their
part-time employment as they want to do, and more job advertisements, their
quality may be dropping. That is not
good, and many potential employees, with higher standards than two years ago,
are being disappointed. In September,
when more people go back to work, we may see better numbers including an even
lower AJSN. This time, however, we still
improved, so the turtle eked out a modest step forward.
No comments:
Post a Comment