Last week I wrote about an angry but clear and defensible post
on the Breitbart.com blog. Written by
Milo Yiannopoulos, “The Sexodus, Part 1:
The Men Giving Up on Women and Checking Out of Society” explored the
recent tendency of males 15 to 30 years old hunkering down alone or with
same-sex friends, and not pursuing jobs or romantic relationships but instead
maintaining a sort of state of early adolescence. I made four main observations about the
phenomenon: that the model of men being
primary breadwinners had good reason to become obsolete; that their joblessness
alone caused deep problems with getting wives or girlfriends; that recent
attention on rape beyond its status as a violent crime, along with mandatory
consent codes, damaged young men even more; and that women were themselves being
hurt badly by men in their 20s and late teens giving up on so many things. The failure of an expanding share of half of
the population to grow up, even beyond lacking the financial ability to take on
more responsibility, is not a value-free cultural change, but destructive in
itself.
So how can we solve, or at least alleviate, this rising
concern?
First, authors, columnists, and involved people themselves
need to publicize the tendency of young men to drop out. There seem always to be articles and books
about the issues faced by women of those same ages, on topics ranging from
high-school cyberbullying to documentation of and commentary on the sex ratios of
those entering scientific and technical fields.
It should not take a rather rough-edged blog post to bring such a sad and
alarming sign of American deterioration to the attention of those publishing in
more widely read outlets, only because the people suffering in this case are
men. We need much more on this subject
to find its way into the likes of David Brooks’s and Ross Douthat’s columns and
the New York Times Sunday Book Review.
Second, men and older teens who find themselves stopped from
jobs or romance need to keep bettering themselves in other ways. One article in the New York Times’s recent series on “nonemployment,” or the growing
tendency of people to not be working, named a disturbing difference between men
and women going through joblessness. Women,
according to Binyamin Appelbaum in “Key Differences Between Men and Women,”
when not employed did more volunteering, exercising, and helping people in
their own families, whereas men did more reading, watching TV, and Internet
surfing. Those choices of activities, as
well as ones taken up by those interviewed and discussed by Yiannopoulos,
reveal an area of improvement for all too many men, who are failing to find
more constructive actions and help themselves in ways they can.
Third, since men’s falling income and employment likelihood
seems to be a trend that will stay around for a while, they should not give up
on either women or on society as quickly.
Men unable to find work should not be ashamed of themselves, and should
not assume that they are ineligible for wives or girlfriends, since they are
hardly the only ones in that situation.
Because of the shrinking number of males with jobs, more women will face
a choice of either being involved with people who are stable and civilized but
not employed, or holding on to old-fashioned expectations about being supported
and eventually settling for being unattached.
If nonworking men can show they are worthy in other ways, they will
usually get somewhere.
Fourth, more husbands should drop the false pride of needing
to earn more than wives with higher income potential and more wholeheartedly
acclimate themselves to contributing secondary income, or even none at
all. The number of househusbands keeps
increasing, but that title still only applies to a small minority – in fact, to
only 140,000 Americans as recently as 2008.
With about 40% of wives earning the most in their families, it is time
for many more men to accept current realities.
Fifth, since the root of so many of young men’s troubles is the
jobs crisis, we need to address it, and at least seriously discuss possible
solutions. Four with at least some merit
are guaranteed income for all, shorter working hours, a system of paying
contributors of online resources, and guaranteed government jobs. Two measures, though they would not be as
permanent, would be a nationwide WPA-style infrastructure program and reformed
taxes to give the lowest rates to those creating or maintaining paid work for
others. There are more, and once the
issue of not enough employment reaches our collective consciousness, they will
also be put on the front burner. And
that is the right place for them.
Two things you forgot.
ReplyDelete1) Jobless men are much less likely than jobless women to receive financial air or welfare, from all sources, meaning it affects them more.
2) 50% of marriages end in divorce which is typically a losing proposition for men. Even without marriage a relationship can be financially and legally disastrous. Women do not typically have to worry about the legal system being brought in to remove them from their homes or place them in jail during a break up.