The largest reasonably important national news this week has
been the riots in Baltimore. Ostensibly
started by the questionably-caused death of citizen Freddie Gray in police
custody, they grew into a remarkably widespread attack on not only the law
enforcement officers themselves, but on cars, businesses, and others. Unlike after similar events last year in
Ferguson, Missouri, moderate liberals in the press are not apologizing for
those destroying property and attacking people.
On Tuesday morning the BBC, in its worldwide Morning Edition and News
Hour programs, showed little sympathy for the rioters, with air time going to
local people saying things similar to “we’ve built up this city, and they are
trying to tear it down – they want it to be better, but they can’t have it both
ways.” The conservative side, headed of
course by Fox News, kept more to the facts – reports from the streets, updates about
the curfews, and interviews with police and other authority figures. In the meantime, helped by 2,000 National
Guard troops and 1,000 more law enforcement officers, the violence has ran its
course. So what can we say about it?
First, any idea of the rioting being justified protests of
the aggrieved is without merit. Many if
not most of the looters were juveniles, so weren’t old enough to have known
racial problems as much as they may have thought they did. Second, the looting and vandalism is without any
coherent purpose – it’s more akin to that popping up after significant sports
results. Third, in the case of a
localized attack, abstract inequality, or those elsewhere having more money and
better opportunities, cannot be to blame.
On the other side, the lack of jobs is certainly a
contributing problem. In Work’s New Age, I documented how that
caused neighborhoods to deteriorate, when people lost the ability to support
themselves and their families. It still
does, and the permanent crisis rates to get worse, not better.
However, the rioters, and their supporters among those now
passing for civil rights leaders, had their methodology all wrong. If there is ever an excuse for rioting,
previous actions by the police aren’t it.
Running from the authorities, for people with nothing to immediately
worry about, shows execrable judgment. Those
who think they or others have been wronged by the authorities should wait until
the immediate situation has ended and then
file lawsuits, file formal complaints, talk with the press, and so on. As for the advantages of action, we can only
imagine how much better West Baltimore would be if those stealing, destroying,
and injuring were to focus that intensity on working for more jobs instead. The most effective, longest lasting, and most
broadly appealing civil disobedience tactics are the nonviolent ones – a
protest march through those same Baltimore streets, coupled by demands on all
fronts for an investigation into Gray’s death, would have gathered supporters
from all over the political spectrum, along with positive attention from the
authorities being questioned. Americans
do not like punks, bullies, and looters, be they running amuck through the
streets or wearing blue uniforms, and race is hardly the entire issue. No matter what else you think, the two wrongs
of poor living conditions and street violence do not make a right.
Sadly, almost everybody lost this week in Baltimore. Innocent car and business owners lost
property. Innocent police officers and
other people were injured. The American
racial impasse was cemented even more in place.
Our black President, while properly calling the rioters “thugs” and
“criminals” while acknowledging problems with police behavior, managed once
again to please neither his base, who wanted him to focus on the latter, nor
others, wishing for him to mention only the former. Our country lost in the eyes of others. The Al Sharptons, Jesse Jacksons and Cornel
Wests may think they profited, but with the common sense view of seeing the
rioters as no more than punks carrying the day, they were defeated too. The thieves and looters, with no prospects of
being equated with 1960s freedom riders, will gain only longer criminal
records. Even the Baltimore Orioles
ended up moving some of their home games at cost of both local and overall
attendance, after, bizarrely, playing one in Camden Yards without
spectators. And the rest of us, wanting
civil rights related progress we can support – instead of racial divisiveness,
unfair press coverage (where are the stories about whites dying in police custody?), demands to ignore cultural
differences at least partially responsible for bad outcomes, and bipartisan acceptance
of the jobs crisis as an American problem – came out behind yet again.
Here's why the crowd was mostly juveniles.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/04/how-baltimore-riots-began-mondawmin-purge