This morning’s Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment Situation Summary was supposed to show a greatly reduced number of net new nonfarm payroll positions, but at 12,000 it didn’t even approach the 110,000 and 115,000 published estimates. How did the other figures turn out?
Seasonally
adjusted and unadjusted unemployment stayed the same, at 4.1% and 3.9%
respectively, with the adjusted count of jobless up 200,000 to 7 million. Of those there were 1.6 million long-term, or
without work for 27 weeks or longer, down 100,000. Those working part-time for economic reasons,
or holding short-hours positions while seeking full-time ones, remained at 4.6
million. The two measures of how common
it is for Americans to be working or officially unemployed, the labor force
participation rate and the employment-population ratio, both worsened, coming
in at 62.6% and 60.0% for drops of 0.1% and 0.2%. The unadjusted number of employed was off
108,000 to 161,938,000. Better, though,
were private nonfarm payroll wages, which gained 10 cents, more than inflation,
to $35.46 per hour.
The American
Job Shortage Number or AJSN, the metric showing how many additional positions
could be quickly filled if all knew they would be easy to get, fell 736,000,
almost all from a much-reduced estimate of the number of Americans living
outside the United States, as follows:
The share of the AJSN from official unemployment rose 2.3% to 37.6%. Compared with a year before, the loss of 900,000 from the expatriates’ contribution was mostly offset by 480,000 more from unemployment and 154,000 from those not looking for work for the previous year, with other changes small, for a 247,000 fall.
What happened
this time? To judge that, we next look
at the measures telling us how many people left or entered the workforce. Those were a 469,000 rise in the count of
those claiming no interest in a job, and 219,000 more overall not in the labor
force. There was also a consistent
shrinkage in the categories of marginal attachment, the 3rd through
6th and 8th rows above.
Those departing workers were why our unemployment rates didn’t worsen, given
fewer new positions than our population increase could absorb. October’s deficiency, possibly created mostly
from storms and sudden layoffs, may well greatly reverse itself next time, but it
is in the books. Accordingly, I saw the
turtle take a small step backwards.
No comments:
Post a Comment